Temperature
    Converter

 

    Hardness
    Converter

 

    Site Map


  ©Jan Matiaska, &
  Scott Thomson,
   2003-2005




Reproduction of the pig-nosed turtle Carettochelys insculpta (RAMSAY, 1886) at the
Rotterdam Zoo.    Radiata 14(3):3-12.

Gerard Visser & Henk Zwartepoorte


Captive breeding
In several zoos mating attempts and oviposition has been observed, although much of the time, eggs have been deposited in the water. On May 25th 2001, eggs were found of the bottom of a tank in the Wilhelma Zoo (Stuttgart, Germany). Most eggs were eaten or destroyed by the fish in the tank (Pangasius spp.) or by the turtles themselves - only two could be saved for incubation. This was done at 30 °C and 80% humidity in Perlite. The humidity was increased after 136 days, and one juvenile hatched on 4 October 2001, after assisted hatching. The other embryo had died, and it was assumed that assited hatching could be necessary. The breeding group consisted of seven animals, many of which had been living in the Zoo for 27 years (KOCH pers. comm., ROEMPP 2003).

Also in 2001, a hatchling was found swimming in the main pool of an exhibit at the Bronx Zoo (New York, U.S.A.), among fishes, turtles and crocodiles. It must have emerged from a clutch that had been deposited on the nesting beach in the exhibit. After intensive search of the enclosure, more eggs were found but these did not develop during incubation (ROEMPP 2003).

In September 2003, ten hatchlings were found in a large, off-exhibit enclosure in the Miami Metrozoo (Florida, U.S.A.). It is believed that these hatchlings were from two separate, undetected nests. The parents had been maintained in that pool for several years (Anonymous 2004).

Breeding at Rotterdam Zoo
As stated above, the breeding trio shared the large aqua-terrarium during parts of 2004. There was a lot of aggression between them and nothing indicated that copulations had taken place. Nevertheless, this must have been the case, as fertile eggs were produced in 2005. Mating behaviour was probably interpreted as aggressive behaviour. Courtship and mating in this species sometimes looks very aggressive.

This means that the female, which arrived as an adult animal in 1978, had produced her first clutch of fertile eggs almost 27 years after her arrival at the zoo.

After we noticed increasing damage on the carapace of the female, the male was taken out of the public tank in November 2004.

     Figs. 3-5. Hatching under water.
 

The female laid 24 eggs on January 10, 2005. In search of a suitable nesting site the female had ignored the beach that had been specifically made for her by the keeping staff, and had left the exhibit through the planter that separates the aquatic part of the tank from the public area. She was found by the night watchman very early in the morning at the bottom of the stairs leading to the public lavatory. Of the three eggs that she laid there, two were broken. After the female was recovered from the public area she was put in an off-exhibit container with a layer of peat, where she produced the rest of the eggs, twenty one in number, approximately one hour after the injection of Calcium-Sandoz and Oxytocine.

Incubation
As hatchling sex is influenced by the incubation temperature, the eggs were incubated in four human incubators at different temperatures: 28, 30, 31.5, and 32 "C, following WEBB et al. (1986). The majority of the embro's incubated at 28-30 °C become males, and the at 32 °C become females. Only after the hatching did we become familiar with the recent paper by Young et al. (2004) on the pivotal range, as cited above. If we would had had that information before, we would I probably have chosen slightly different incubation temperatures.

Vermiculite was used as a substrate, with two exceptions: two eggs were incubated on a peat- vermiculate mix, one at 30 "C and one at 32 "C.

On the second day a small white dot became visible on the eggs and by the fourth day, the eggs turned completely white. When the eggs were candled on day 18, three eggs showed signs of fertilization. On day 27, 15 eggs turned out to be fertile, with an embryo of about 20 mm in length visible (see fig. 1).

On March 15 (day 61), egg number 10 (32 °C) was submerged in water for 5 minutes. The egg floated and there was apparently no effect. This was repeated on day 66 (for 10 minutes) and day 75 (30 minutes), still without any result. On April 7 (day 84) the egg sank immediately and hatched after 20 minutes. Eggs nos. 6, 7 and 8 also sunk, and these subsequently hatched after 15 minutes.

The next day (day 85) egg nos. 4, 5 and 6 (also from 32 °C) hatched after 15, 20 and 23 minutes, and on day 90, egg no 3 hatched after being submerged for 32 minutes. This egg was specially selected and kept to hatch in front of the press and the audience as a special event when the Rotterdam Zoo and EAZA launched the 2005 EAZA Shellshock Campaign in the Netherlands. The complete data on the hatching can be found in Table 1.

Only one egg (number 15) hatched in the incubator, thus without being submerged in water. This was an egg that was incubated at 28 °C.

Prior to submersion all eggs were checked for viability with help of a so called Buddy-Egg, a commercially developed apparatus for registration of the heartbeat of bird embryos. At Rotterdam Zoo, we already had very positive experiences using this device for checking eggs of crocodiles Paleosuches palpebrosus and Gila monster Heloderma suspecturn. All viable eggs proved to have a rate of 78 to 85 heartbeats per minute.

 

Navigation:     Page 1     Page 2     Page 3     Page 4     Page 5