Harriet, The Galapagos Tortoise. Disclosing One and a Half Centuries of History. Reptilia Number 2, March / April 1998.
"Tom Galapagos tortoise Died 1929 Brisbane Botanical Gardens"
A close inspection of the specimen brought an even more startling identification. Morphological identifications of Galapagos tortoises are always dubious but this one, a female, had some features which may give a reasonable identification. This was a small Galap, about 80cm straight carapace length, it was a domed form, and yet if it was one of the Botanical garden animals it had to be fully grown as it was at least 60 years old going by David Fleay’s earliest arrival date. It was a very healthy tortoise in its growth form, nice and symmetrical, no bossing of the scutes, no obvious deformities. This animal would appear to be a San Cristobal Tortoise (Geochelone nigra cathamensis) and by this I mean the extinct one from the south of San Cristobal not the half saddleback form (actually a new subspecies not G.n. cathamensis) from the north of the island that they find there now. The wild population of this subspecies disappeared at the turn of the century, the other population was found in the 1950’s. Most important of all was that the very existence of this specimen verified part of Ed Loveday’s story.
|
So where are we at the moment? We know that Darwin collected from three populations: Santa Maria tortoise (Geochelone nigra nigra). San Cristobal tortoise (Geochelone nigra cathamensis) and the Santiago tortoise (Geochelone nigra darwini). Based on Darwin‘s notes all the tortoises collected were juveniles and based on the few sizes given they were probably between one and five years old.
We have an account that the three original tortoises were brought to Australia by John Clements Wickham when he moved to Australia and became First Government Resident of Moreton Bay. Wickham was the First Lieutenant of the Beagle under Capt. Fitz Roy, and later Captain of the Beagle. Wickham never went to the Galapagos so he had to obtain the tortoises of somebody else, the most likely person would be Darwin. Currently we are having mtDNA analysis done to confirm the identifications of Harriet and Tom. Tom as a preserved specimen may not work but we feel that he is worth the risk to try anyway. This will be done by Ed Louis of Texas A & M University. We still have to get to the John Oxley Library and Ian Swingland is looking into things from the English end. Well, this is how the story unfolded so far. The difficult thing to conceive is Harriet's age, to bring this into perspective we have constructed a chronology (Chart 2). To do this we interweave some significant human events into a chronology of events Harriet went through, assuming the story is correct. After all, just imagine being some 167 years old!!
First published in "Intermontanus" (Publication of the Utah Association of Herpetologists) Vol. 4. Nr. 5 (1995): 33-35.
Navigation: Page 1 Page 2 |